Peyronie’s Disease fibrotic anomalies.

Peyronie’s Disease fibrotic anomalies

Peyronie’s Disease (PD) is characterized by fibrous plaques or scar tissue in the tunica albuginea of the penis, leading to curvature, pain, or sexual dysfunction. Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) is a non-invasive treatment aimed at softening or breaking down these plaques, but the efficacy varies due to differences in plaque characteristics and patient factors. Some fibrotic anomalies are more resistant due to:

  • Plaque Composition and Calcification:
    • Calcified Plaques: Plaques with significant calcium deposits are harder and less responsive to shockwave therapy. Calcification, often a marker of chronic disease, makes the tissue more rigid and resistant to mechanical disruption. Studies note that non-calcified or softer plaques respond better to Li-ESWT.

    • Collagen Density: Dense, mature collagen fibers in older plaques are less pliable than newer, less organized fibrous tissue. Acute-phase plaques (less than 12 months) are more susceptible to remodeling due to their inflammatory state.

  • Disease Phase and Duration:
    • Acute vs. Chronic Phase: Li-ESWT is more effective in the acute (inflammatory) phase, where plaques are still forming and more malleable. In the chronic phase, stabilized plaques are less responsive due to reduced cellular activity and increased fibrosis.
    • Longer Disease Duration: Plaques present for over 12 months are less likely to regress spontaneously or respond to mechanical therapies like Li-ESWT, as they are more fibrotic and less biologically active.

  • Plaque Size and Complexity:
    • Larger or Multiple Plaques: Larger plaques or those with multiple foci are harder to treat due to the increased volume of fibrotic tissue. Complex deformities, such as hourglass shapes or multi-axis curvatures, also reduce treatment efficacy.
    • Location: Plaques deeper in the tunica albuginea or near critical structures may be less accessible to shockwave energy, limiting penetration and effect.

  • Patient-Specific Factors:
    • Age: Younger patients with milder curvature and shorter disease duration tend to respond better, possibly due to more active tissue repair mechanisms.
    • Comorbidities: Conditions like diabetes or vascular disease can impair tissue remodeling and angiogenesis, reducing shockwave’s effectiveness.
    • Plaque Vascularity: Poor blood flow to the plaque area limits the body’s ability to clear degraded tissue or form new vessels, which Li-ESWT aims to stimulate.

  • Treatment Protocol Variability:
    • Energy Settings and Frequency: The efficacy of Li-ESWT depends on parameters like energy flux density (e.g., 0.1–0.25 mJ/mm²), number of shockwaves (e.g., 3000–4000 per session), and session frequency. Suboptimal settings may fail to disrupt resistant plaques.
    • Device Type: Focused shockwave therapy (FSWT) is more effective than radial shockwave therapy (RSWT).
    • Number of Sessions: Insufficient sessions may not provide enough cumulative energy to break down tougher plaques.


Summary

Some Peyronie’s fibrotic anomalies are harder to break up due to calcification, chronicity, plaque size, patient factors, and treatment protocol variations. Li-ESWT is more effective for acute-phase, non-calcified plaques in younger patients with milder disease. However, even with correct application and sufficient treatments, Li-ESWT will not always break up scar tissue completely, particularly in chronic or calcified cases. It may reduce pain and soften plaques but often requires combination therapies for optimal results, and some patients may still need surgical intervention.

Links:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39375617/

https://wjmh.org/DOIx.php?id=10.5534/wjmh.180100

Recommended Posts